v2.11.0 (5648)

Cours scientifiques - ECO_53451_EP : Econometrics of Competition

Domaine > Economie.

Descriptif

PURPOSE

The purpose of this module is to equip students with the specialist tools to conduct quantitative economic assessments relevant to competition cases and regulatory matters. It will cover key techniques to empirically analyze markets. We will use data-driven examples from selected industries in France and internationally. The content of the course will be based on a discussion of selected academic papers to introduce the theory and their practical applications to competition and regulatory cases.

The course will combine lectures and hands-on sessions during which real industry data sets will be used to conduct econometric estimations in R. Regular homework assignments will also enable to practice independently the empirical methods taught during the lectures.

 

OUTCOMES

Students should be able to:

  • Learn about the practical considerations to apply techniques, based on the lessons from various recent cases where quantitative techniques have been applied.
  • Understand the different techniques for quantitative assessment of competition and regulatory matters, such as in defining markets
  • Estimate demand functions (homogenous and differentiated products)
  • Undertake quantitative analysis relevant to analyzing competition and regulation matters such as the identification of market power, merger simulations, and estimation of damages.
  • Learn to interpret and critically evaluate the empirical results from different approaches.
  • Develop a good common sense of the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches, and the circumstances under which they are (not) suitable.
  • Acquire a thorough understanding of the data requirements for applying various techniques

 

READING

  • Davis, P. and E. Garces (2009) “Quantitative Techniques for Competition and Antitrust Analysis”, Princeton University Press.
  • Luis Cabral (2000) “Introduction to Industrial Organization”, The MIT Press
  • Train, K. (2009) “Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation”, Cambridge University Press

 

ASSESMENT CRITERIA

  • Homework assignments (x3): 30%
  • Exam: 70%

Diplôme(s) concerné(s)

Parcours de rattachement

Objectifs de développement durable

ODD 8 Travail décent et croissance économique.

Format des notes

Numérique sur 20

Littérale/grade réduit

Pour les étudiants du diplôme MScT-Data and Economics for Public Policy (DEPP)

Pour les étudiants du diplôme MScT-Economics, Data Analytics and Corporate Finance

Le rattrapage est autorisé (Note de rattrapage conservée)
    L'UE est acquise si note finale transposée >= C
    • Crédits ECTS acquis : 4 ECTS

    La note obtenue rentre dans le calcul de votre GPA.

    Programme détaillé

    DATE

    TOPIC

    Monday, 30 September (4h30)

     Session 1: Oligopolistic Competition Refresher

    · Introduction to course and course structure

    · The Cournot Game - quantity competition

    · Bertrand's Paradox - price competition

    · Price competition with differentiated products

    Readings

    · Luis Cabral (2000), Chapters 6 and 7

    · Davis and Garces (2009), Chapter 1

     

    Monday, 7 October (2h15)

     

    Session 2: Estimation of Demand for Homogenous Goods

    · New Empirical Industrial Organization (NEIO)

    · Estimating the demand function for a homogenous good

    · Simultaneity of demand and supply

    Readings

    · Davis and Garces (2009), Chapters 2 and 9 

     

    Monday, 7 October (2h15)

     

    Session 2: Identification of Conduct and Collusion

    · Identification of conduct parameter

    · Inferring collusion from market data

    · Discussion of Genesove and Mullin (1998)

    Readings

    · Davis and Garces (2009), Chapter 6

    · Genesove and Mullin (1998) “Testing Static Oligopoly Models: Conduct and Cost in the Sugar Industry, 1890-1914”, RAND Journal of Economics. 

     

    Monday, 14 October (4h30)

     

    Session 3: Homogenous Goods Tutorial

    · Practical R workshop on the estimation of railway cartel (read Porter, 1983)

    · Introduction to Exercise 1 (due Monday, 21 October)

    Readings

    · Porter, R.H. (1983) “A study of cartel stability: the Joint Executive Committee, 1880-1886”. The Bell Journal of Economics

     

    Monday, 21 October (4h30)

    Sessions 4: Product Differentiation, Multinomial and Nested Logit

    · Differentiated goods

    · Discrete choice model and characteristics space

    · Logit model and nested logit model

    · Estimating demand elasticities

    Readings

    · Davis and Garces (2010), Chapter 9

    · Berry, S. (1994), “Estimating Discrete-Choice Models of Product Differentiation”, RAND Journal of Economics

     

    Monday, 4 November (4h30)

    Sessions 5: Differentiated Products Tutorial

    · Practical R workshop on differentiated demand estimation

    · Introduction to Exercise 2 (due Monday, 18 November)

    Readings

    · Train, K. (2009) “Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation” 

     

    Monday, 18 November (4h30)

    Session 6:  Market Structure and Entry

    · Bresnahan and Reiss framework for empirical analysis

    · Market entry in telecommunications markets

    Readings

    · Davis and Garces (2009), Chapter 5

    · Bresnahan, T. F. and P. C. Reiss (1991). “Entry and competition in concentrated markets”, Journal of Political Economy 99(5), 977–1009 

     

    Monday, 24 November (3h)

    Session 7: Merger Analysis

    · Overview of merger control

    · Unilateral and coordinated effects

    · SSNIP test

    · Diversion Ratios

    · Upward Pricing Pressure (UPP)

    · Introduction to merger simulation

    Readings

    · Davis and Garces (2010), Chapter 4

    · Moresi, S. (2010) “The Use of Upward Price Pressure Indices in Merger Analysis”

     

    Monday, 9 December (3h)

    Session 8: Merger Analysis Tutorial

    · Practical R workshop on merger analysis

    · Calculating market shares, HHI and UPP

    · Introduction to Exercise 2 (due Monday, 16 November)

    Readings

    · Björnerstedt and Verboven (2016) “Does Merger Simulation Work? Evidence from the Swedish Analgesics Market”, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics

    Monday, 16 December

    Exam

     

    Veuillez patienter